Convergence of functions at a point: Let X be a subset of Rn, let f:X→Rm be a function, let E be a subset of X, x0 be an adherent point of E, and let L∈Rm. We say that fconverges toLatx0inE and write
x→x0,x∈Elimf(x)=L,
iff∀ϵ>0,∃δ>0, s.t. ((∀x∈E∧d(x0,x)<δ) ⟶d(f(x),L)<ϵ) is true.
Equivalent definition
The following statements are equivalent:
f converges to L at x0 in E.
For every sequence (an)n=0∞ which consists entirely of elements of E and converges to x0, the sequence (f(an))n=0∞ converges to L.
proof:
(1) ⟶ (2):
(1) ⟺∀ϵ>0,∃δ>0, s.t. ((∀x∈E∧d(x0,x)<δ) ⟶d(f(x),L)<ϵ) is true. (an→x0)⟺∀δ>0,∃N∈Z≥0, s.t. ∀n≥N,d(an,x0)<δ
Then, ∀ϵ>0,∃N∈Z≥0, s.t. ∀n≥N,d(f(an),L)<ϵ
so, (f(an))n=0∞ converges to L.
(2) ⟶ (1):
Suppose f does not converge to L at x0 in E.
It means that ∃ϵ>0,∀δ>0,∃x∈E∧d(x0,x)<δ s.t. d(f(x),L)≥ϵ
Choose δ=n+11,n∈Z≥0
Then, ∃xn∈E,d(x0,xn)<n+11,d(f(xn),L)≥ϵ
so, (xn)n=0∞ is a sequence which consists entirely of elements of E and converges to x0, but (f(xn))n=0∞ does not converge to L.
This is a contradiction.
Therefore, f converges to L at x0 in E.
For n=1
We can get the law of limit of functions in one variable from the law of limit of sequences.
where we have dropped the restriction x∈E for brevity
For n>1
x=(x1,x2,⋯,xn)T∈Rn
xn→y means that ∀ϵ>0,∃N∈Z≥0, s.t. ∀n≥N,d(xn,y)<ϵ
The following statements are equivalent:
xn→y
∀i∈{1,2,⋯,n},(xin)n=0∞→yi
proof:
(1) ⟶ (2): xn→y means that ∀ϵ>0,∃N∈Z≥0, s.t. ∀n≥N,∑i=1n(xin−yi)2<ϵ
so, ∀i∈{1,2,⋯,n},∃Ni∈Z≥0, s.t. ∀n≥Ni,∣xin−yi∣≤∑i=1n(xin−yi)2<ϵ
(2) ⟶ (1): (xin)n=0∞→yi means that ∀ϵ>0,∃Ni∈Z≥0, s.t. ∀n≥Ni,∣xin−yi∣<ϵ/n
Let N=max{N1,N2,⋯,Nn}
Then, ∀n≥N,∑i=1n(xin−yi)2≤∑i=1n∣xin−yi∣<n(ϵ/n)=ϵ
so, xn→y